Hancock

Comment

Comment by Dolomite on July 3, 2008 at 11:15am

Wait? What? Leon didn't even give his rating at all? Wow you guys glossed him over, ouch.

Comment by GorTheMovieGod on July 3, 2008 at 2:52am

In your face Bitch!!!! lol great review

Comment by Bijan on July 3, 2008 at 1:09am

Korey nailed it. I felt something wasn't right and he said it. I also saw wanted and disagree with the harsh criticism. For a popcorn movie you get what you pay for.

Comment by Gamexprt1 on July 3, 2008 at 12:23am

This is by far your guy's funniest reviews ever. But what was Leon's rating?
+ Did anyone else notice Leon's afro sproing up at 1:16?

Comment by Lexi on July 2, 2008 at 10:46pm

Great review, been looking forward to this film for awhile now.

Comment by DMajorBoss on July 2, 2008 at 9:24pm

If a sequel were made, I'm sure that Red Bull and Chappelle would get a hefty cut.

^_^

Anyway, yet another entertaining review; thanks for sharing.

Comment by BSKM16 on July 2, 2008 at 8:27pm

Korey was so right about this movie but yaw the first half of this movie was so funny. It was like hancock could say almost any thing to make me lafe this hast to be will smith funniest movie so far. I also like how they made this movie funny and serious but yaw there were bits in pieces that I didnt like about in this movie. But for overal it was a pretty good movie so from A to F i give HANCOCK a B.

Comment by EriksBlue on July 2, 2008 at 8:11pm

Looks like a cool movie

Comment by khris on July 2, 2008 at 8:11pm

I definitely enjoyed watching Hancock but I also had a couple problems with it . Problem #1 was when Mary's explaining how that they are made in pairs and are like attracted to each other and how she and our boy hancock have been together for centuries and they were living together as husband and wife in like the 40's or some thing. ( I HATE TO POINT OUT THE OBVIOUS BUT WOULDN'T THAT HAVE BEEN A PROBLEM WITH THE WAY RACISM WAS VERY OUT IN THE OPEN BACK THEN SO TELL ME HOW DID THAT WORK OUT FOR THEM???) but she also said it made them physically vulnerable , made them become human so they could grow old together ( AND EVENTUALLY DIE OF OLD AGE AND WE ARE SUPPOSE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE CENTURIES OLD ) and they were less vulnerable when they were apart. so how is it that they were married and all that. That whole thing sounded like a bunch of b.s. that the writers didn't even think about and obviously they think that the audience is a bunch of brain dead zombies willing to believe what ever they tell us. Also it would have been nice to know a little more about what they really are and why they are here. #2 the thing with the bad guy what was up with that? they could have done a little more with him cuz as it stands in my opinion he was just over reacting with that whole brake a group of prisoners out and try to blow up all the people at the bank just to get Hancock's attention . I think they should have given more detail on him was he 1 of the many Hancock put away? And also when he got his other hand cut off why did he say not again was it Hancock related before ? But it isn't all bad I have some good to point out... I like the way Hancock was more like real he was flawed what with his crappy but somewhat understandable attitude and it was like he was trying to do good but kept kinda messing up. I especially like the train wreck scene were he saves Jason Bateman ( who by they way i loved in this movie as well as Juno) character by flipping car up and the whole crowd gets out of their cars and start yelling at him about what a crappy job he did how the indian lady should sue him and how if they did it they would have done a better job and of course no one realizes that he just saved a persons life. I could definately see that happening in real life. Also this movie addresses the issue of property damage and super heroes in all other movies batman or superman or spidey can total devastate the surrounding area and no one ever says a word but Hancock gets all sorts of crap for it and even eventually jail time ( ABOUT AS MUCH JAIL TIME AS PARIS HILTON) but again that really doesn't suprise me either cuz as everyone knows in the real world rich and/or famous people live by a different set of rules than the rest of us and can't really be expected to ever really be held accountable for any wrong doing be it murder or vehicular manslaughter to shoplifting and D.U.I. or even child endangerment ( right Michael J.?) so that was pretty believable. Even with all its flaws I give it a full price movie and when is the sequel???

Comment by PenguinNinja on July 2, 2008 at 6:17pm

IN YO' FACE BITCH!

Haha... Korey...

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last