If it's crap ... We'll tell you
Chio posted a status
TAGibby4 posted a blog post
M.K posted a status
VideaVice posted a status
The latest installment of the James Bond franchise, 'Skyfall,' hasn't even landed in theaters yet, and already plans are being solidified for the next two films in the series. This shouldn't be an enormous surprise when considering the longevity and legacy of this franchise, but the turmoil at the studio of late made the continuation of these films anything but a certainty. According to reports, Academy Award nominated screenwriter John Logan ('Hugo'), who wrote the final draft of the script for 'Skyfall,' will not only write Bond 24, but Bond 25 as well. Evidently the next two films will contain one over-arching story. Though it is not set in stone who will direct the next outings, the studio hopes to have Bond 24 in production by fall of 2013.
This is mostly great news. After that whole MGM bankruptcy thing that threatened the franchise, it's good to know we don't have to worry about the possibility of those delays happening again for some time. My only wish is that they had made this deal, and settled on a title for the next one, a few months ago so we could get a return to the old school Bond formula involving the "Bond Will Be Back in XYZ" postscript that used to follow the roll of each end credits and hint at the next movie. If early reactions to 'Skyfall' are any indication, locking down Logan for two more films was a smart move. My only concern is that the last time we had one of these two-movie story arcs, it was across 'Casino Royale' and 'Quantum of Solace,' and let's just say the conclusion to that story was anything but satisfying. My hope here is that there will be a more cohesive narrative threadline that connects Bonds 24 and 25, and the fact that it looks like they'll pretty much be shot back-to-back is encouraging.
What do you guys think? Does the idea of another two-movie story arc entice or concern you? How can they avoid the story pitfalls of 'Quantum of Solace?'
Source: Daily Mail; Deadline
Comment
Comment by Mainstream12 on October 31, 2012 at 6:51am
Comment by Winner of Red Shirt Survivor on October 30, 2012 at 1:05pm For my money, the only problems that Quantum of Solace had (aside from the TERRIBLE editing) was that it was facing the writing stages right when the writers strike was happening, so they greenlit it too fast. I'm not gonna justify the flaws it has, it can be hard to watch, but I don't think that it should be used as an excuse not to do two episode arcs.
Comment by Maxou on October 30, 2012 at 8:37am You can't always judges a writer's talent because a couple of movies he wrote are not good. Considering a script has 3 lifes in movie bussiness, writing, filming and editing. The best script of all time can be butchered in any of the 2 following phase, and a so-so script can be elevated by the following 2 steps as well.
But i would agree, like in everything, there are bad ones and good ones.
Comment by Victor P. on October 29, 2012 at 11:04pm As long as Daniel Craig is in it I'm good
I hope they ignore Quantum and bring back SPECTRE.

Comment by Will Sanefski on October 29, 2012 at 6:44pm
Comment by Will Sanefski on October 29, 2012 at 6:44pm
Comment by DaveTheBrave on October 29, 2012 at 5:13pm John Logan has to be the most overrated writer in Hollywood. "The Last Samurai" blows, "Star Trek: Nemesis" blows, and I didn't even see that Sinbad movie, but I'm sure that it blows too. Given his sketchy performances I would not give this guy control over any franchise. EVER.
Comment by Boatloads1017 on October 29, 2012 at 5:05pm I don't mind them doing two movie arcs, but bringing back SPECTRE and having a long term villain organization would be nice.
Comment by Allan, Dane of Thrones on October 29, 2012 at 4:51pm Stop with the interconnecting of Bond movies! That's not what they're about!
© 2013 Created by The Spill Crew.
You need to be a member of The Spill Movie Community to add comments!
Join The Spill Movie Community