Comment

Comment by fearfulmatrix on March 30, 2013 at 9:42pm

Ya'll just need to just chill the fk out, the movie looks amazing in 48. Cohost needs to stop talking for "everyone" in that people are not going to get used to 48.

Also, the movie really bored me in that only a few of the dwarves had character development... the rest were just there for comic relief. Bilbo's story was not compelling and had a lot of missing development... all of the sudden he's become a warrior that can handle a sword, like wtf... Even Merry and Pippin had to learn to handle a sword in the fellowship. The only real character was Thorin, which I would've liked to see the movie be based off of.

Comment by fearfulmatrix on March 30, 2013 at 9:40pm

Ya'll just need to just chill the fk out, the movie looks amazing in 48. Cohost needs to stop talking for "everyone" in that people are not going to get used to 48.

Also, the movie really bored me in that only a few of the dwarves had character development... the rest were just there for comic relief. 

Comment by Tyler Valdal on January 28, 2013 at 11:03pm

Judging in on 48fps rather then 24fp is like seeing without your glasses looks good but it could look way better with your fucking glasses on

Comment by Tyler Valdal on January 28, 2013 at 11:02pm

I saw the film in 48fps and 24fp and let me tell you 48fps was HD and to clear yes but you can tell he ment the movie to be that way , i though 24fp was to dark and did not have to flashy and beautiful shots that was ment to be

Comment by Ryan Hawbecker on January 27, 2013 at 3:24pm

My Review of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey  http://www.ryanhawbecker.com/2012/12/the-hobbit-unexpected-journey-movie.html?spref=tw …

Comment by Toe Knee Bee Ears on January 10, 2013 at 10:42pm

Comment by Hector Fernando Andrade JR. II on January 6, 2013 at 9:52pm

@Leon: East Bridgewater Cinema 6 has the worst sound system in my opinion.

Comment by Hector Fernando Andrade JR. II on January 6, 2013 at 12:45pm

My Uncle Jose and I saw the 7:00 P.M. movie presentation of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey in 2D last night.

 

The only 2 things that I knew walking into this movie were this:

 

1. The story: Bilbo Baggins (played by Martin Freeman) is a reluctant hobbit who wanted to be left alone in his quiet comfort which is a hobbit-hole who is called by the wizard Ganddalf (played by Ian McKellen) and 13 other homeless dwarves led by Thorin Oakenshield (played by Richard Armitage) to go on an unexpected journey across Middle-earth to go to The Lonely Mountain to get their gold back from Smaug the dragon.

 

2. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is a prequel to The Lord of the Rings trilogy.

 

I thought that The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey was a fun, funny and epic prequel with a very good story with a lot of funny lines written by Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Guillermo del Toro, awesome acting performances by Martin Freeman, Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage and Andy Serkis, great directing by Peter Jackson, fantastic visuals by Weta Digital, incredible action scenes, amazing music by Howard Shore and charming message about a good and brave hobbit learning not to doubt himself and his intelligence to gain the confidence necessary so that he can make a big difference in the world no matter how confusing and difficult the mission may seem at first.

 

Overall If you haven't read The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings trilogy by J.R.R. Tolken or seen the beloved movie trilogy like I have and you lower your expectations then I guarantee that this fun movie will be an unexpected surprise of a good movie for you just as it did for me.

 

I give The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey a Full Price and I hope you enjoy The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.

Comment by Jojotogi on December 30, 2012 at 11:54am

Though for everything else in 48 fps, this image did look too clean and sped up at times. If you're a 35 mm/24 fps fan who HAS to have the artifacts in their movie, avoid HFR and seek out a 24 fps projection (call ahead of time. Some theaters won't mention which screens are using which format).

Comment by Jojotogi on December 30, 2012 at 11:52am

Saw it for the second time last night. Actually thought it was better on the second g-around, though I'm a bit biased toward liking the film to begin with (see my avatar).

Things I was kind of unsure about the first time are growing on me (Radagast, for instance, is a lot more charming and useful once you get over his little eccentricities). And since I accidentally got into a 48 fps screening, the effects I thought were kind of wonky at 24 fps were much, much better integrated.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 14
• Next ›
• Page