2012
Directed by Roland Emmerich
Starring: John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor
Running Time: 158 Mins
Genre: Adventure | Action
"You were warned, we told you it was a Roland Emmerich film. Did you listen?"
If only life was like a Roland Emmerich film, boy i would be mightly annoyed! That’s right, he’s back and armed with even bigger weapons of mass destruction pitting mother nature itself against mankind; and asking us to pay up for a film we’ve seen several times before. 2012 is everything you would expect from a Roland Emmerich film who, in my opinion, is quickly becoming the new Michael Bay. It’s got cheesy one liners, big explosions and some of the most atrocious dialogue you’ll see all year! If that sits we’ll with you then sit back, hold tight and enjoy 2 hours of sensational special effects. If recycled material can’t hold your attention for long then seeing this film, would be disastrous. If this is the way the world ends then I’ll be checking myself out before 2012.
In between the explosions and quakes you sometimes hear snatches of the script, and then wish you hadn't. Calling it cookie cutter generic trash is a drastic understatement. This is nothing more than been there, done that material and if you’re going in with the mindset for a great brooding storyline then you will be sorely disappointed. The movie takes some serious liberties with its mythos diving into theory that are neither developed or even mildly believable. An underdevelopment in story mirrors a serious lack of depth of character, which in turn leaves to a state of disconnect with the protagonist. Do we really care if John Cusack and his kids make it to live another day; we might if Emmerich wasn’t at the helm. As it stands the characters are so underdeveloped and downright irritating that you will most likely clap at their ultimate demise. Not to mention, dragging the weak script down further lies some serious character flaws developing around the third act. I refuse to ruin it for you but a certain character makes a brash decision that is completely against any logical, feasible state of mind and is use to simply move to impish plot further into oblivion.
Disaster movie maven Roland Emmerich (Independence Day, The Day After Tomorrow) crafts this apocalyptic sci-fi thriller following the prophecy stated by the ancient Mayan calendar, which says that the world will come to an end on December 21, 2012. When a global cataclysm thrusts the world into chaos, divorced writer and father Jackson Curtis (John Cusack) joins the race to ensure that humankind is not completely wiped out. Chiwetel Ejiofor, Danny Glover, Amanda Peet, Thandie Newton, and Oliver Platt round out the cast of this end-of-the-world thriller co-scripted by the director and his 10,000 B.C. writer/composer, Harald Kloser.
Emmerich’s direction is weak and standard, it’s nothing more than long, drawn-out stretches of dreadful exposition punctuated by some of the most explosive action of the year. It’s a worrying combination of the downright exceptional and the atrocious and Emmerich is constantly juggling the two. This makes the overall experience feel clunky and at times a chore to watch. The main problem facing 2012’s direction is the absurd notion of making the experience two and a half hours long. Half of that may be tolerable, the dialogue may not feel quite as stilted but as it stand 2012 is a lengthy, tedious, dreary experience that will have you begging to meet your making long before the final curtain draws. If I knew the end of the world would have been this boring, I wouldn’t have bothered. Call me bias, I’ve never been a fan of Emmerich. Even his critically acclaimed epic “Independence Day” is something I found bloated and self indulged, I’m not a fan, I doubt I ever will be.
Acting is, all over the place, some actors hit all the right notes and tones delivering a convincing performance, home grown Chiwetel Ejiofor leading at the front, while others, Protagonist John Cusack act as if their sleepwalking through their roles. It’s understandable; I mean if you were cast to star in a Roland Emmerich movie would you take it seriously? I doubt it. Still, for what it’s worth the acting isn’t drastic, the main niggles comes from some whining supporting cast. It’s not technically up to scratch but for a film so poorly put together, the acting comes off as average, nothing more, nothing less.
If you though this review was all doom and gloom be happy to know that 2012 does have some redeeming qualities. Simply put, visually it’s a stunner on many levels, the amount of detail and realism put into every effect is pulled off with the highest conviction. One set piece in particular reigns as one of my personal favourites; let’s just say Yellowstone volcano makes for some impressive fireworks. And the audio end 2012 hold up nicely, the sheer volume at any one time never fails to impress and visually the package is near perfect, the only tarnish i could complain about it the fact that the first half of the film is where the moneys is really at, both of the most exciting set pieces happen before we even enter the second act and everything that follows pales in comparison. It’s not much of a criticism but a mere blemish on what is otherwise a fantastic looking movie.
Verdict: 2012 is a Roland Emmerich movie, so that means the world collapses while actors try to find a safe place to speak their inane dialogue. The impressive visual package cant rescue this disaster from being any more than a generic, paint by number Roland Emmerich movie. The plot is frivolous and almost interchangeable from “The Day After Tomorrow” and the direction is shockingly abysmal! If this really is the way the world ends, you can count me out. If you feel like you've seen all this genre has to offer, save your ten dollars and take comfort that you're probably right.
Story: 2.3
Direction: 3.4
Acting: 5.0
Presentation: 8.2
Overall: 4.8/10
You need to be a member of The Spill.com Movie Community to add comments!
Join this Ning Network