Follow Spill!

Latest Activity


Staff
Fungusmonkey's blog post was featured

Changes on Spill

It's been a rough couple months for us in general, but I can honestly say that this week is the…See More
2 minutes ago
Mike Brown posted a blog post
4 minutes ago
Profile IconUnstoppable, GeordieJedi and Allan joined Rhys Lawrence Ainsworth's group
Thumbnail

The Cocaine Princesses

we are the True descendants of our lord Greedo sent to destroy all those unholy scum that claim to…See More
4 minutes ago
Jack Mooney posted a status
"The night is darkest just before the dawn. And I promise you, the dawn is coming. -Harvey Dent ...fitting"
4 minutes ago
TheDVDGrouch posted a blog post

Game of Thrones S3E8 "Second Sons" Review

Armin & Joel return for another episode of Game Of Thrones.See More
4 minutes ago
Profile Iconoddmofo122, Anthony and 41 other members joined Illegal Swede's group
Thumbnail

The Loading Bar Appreciation and Remembrence Society

For The Loading Bar: Gone but not forgotten.A place for Ladyboy Tequila Slaves and Cocaine…See More
6 minutes ago
Dr.Horrible posted a status
"I can't even say how upset I am about the Loading Bar ending. You think they would have got the message with the success Barmaggedon. Fuck."
7 minutes ago
DevilishlyHandsome49 posted a status
"Is it normal that I'm beginning to cry over what's happening to Spill right now?"
8 minutes ago

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Music

Loading…

Is Malcolm In the Middle, The Marx Brothers or The Three Stooges of the 2000s?





I recently sat down and watched and appreciated reruns of Malcolm of the Middle and I must say out of the last decade this has to be one of the funniest well written and well acted sitcoms to involve an extremely dysfunctional family. I think one of the most appealing aspects is the broad and complex characterization of the no last name family and the even broader slapstick which remind me of the Marx Brothers...or is it The Three Stooges?

To me, I find the two greatest comedy teams to be similar to the four brothers in the TV series. I want to take the time to compare and contrast Malcolm, Reese, Dewey, and Francis to likes of Groucho, Chico, Harpo, Zeppo, Moe, Larry, Curly, and Shemp. I want to see if the brothers' antics are witty, anarchic grandsons of the Marx Brothers or the dimwitted Three Stooges.

Ok, let's look at the brothers to the Marx Brothers. First let's look into the main brother of the two, Groucho and Malcolm.


They are the wisecracking and manipulative of the bunch and they repeatedly break the fourth wall in order to carry their point across.


However their motived couldn't be any different. Groucho seems to crash into high society and manipulate anyone in his path for his own motives that usually involve money. Malcolm's motivation is more complex, he's an egotistical genius who wants to lead a normal life, but thanks to his family and himself he never seems to achieve it. It is obvious though that both Groucho and Malcolm cannot go somewhere without hurling insults to everyone they set eyes on. They also however seem to outwit their opponents when luck is on their side if it means Groucho outwitting the entire New York Opera Company in A Night At The Opera (1935) or Malcolm outwit his teacher, Lionel Herkabe's system of teaching in the gifted class in the episode, Emancipation 3x02. However most of the time their schemes backfire in their face because they are so full of themselves. Another thing they have in common is their rocky relationships with women, in most of the films, Groucho always pursues and harass Margaret Dumont's high societal character and usually chase her because of her position and money and make snide remarks to her everytime he gets. And if she wasn't there he usually chase down some hot tail like Thelma Todd Malcolm, once again is complex he seems to date blonde women who are complete airheads I guess to be an opposite to his intellect, but even then he blows his chances.


Now let's look at Reese and Chico Marx.


These two are the dumb schemers of the group. Even though Groucho and Malcolm pronounce them as idiots, Reese and Chico usually out cons them like Chico conning Groucho at the races in A Day At The Races (1937) when Groucho tries to con Chico out of his money and Reese using the church donations for him and his brothers' selfish uses in the episode, Charity 3x05.

While Chico is not as violent as Reese he does have occasional fights with Harpo and both Reese and Chico usually team up with Dewey and Harpo when they go into a scheme that usually involves destruction.



Dewey and Harpo are the child like innocent in the group. They are also the most mischievous and also most misunderstood. They both crave attention as Harpo is the mute and Dewey is ignored by his parents and abused by his brothers. And like Harpo (who plays the harp), Dewey has a great ear for music as he play the piano and compose his own musical compositions. In my opinion, Harpo and represent the silent majority of America.

The fourth brother of the two groups, Francis and Zeppo are often the unsung heroes. They are both the straight men of the four brothers. However I think this is were the similarities end as both personalities are vastly different. Zeppo is the well behaved straight laced gentleman who takes Groucho's insults like a man. Francis however is a complete rebellious troublemaker who has misadventures when trying to one up his mother, Lois. Even though they are different from each other, Groucho and Malcolm still rely on their council every once and a a while. If anything Francis and Zeppo provide some sort of sanity in a world of madness around them. And much like Francis's subplot misadventures from his family. Zeppo after the failure of Duck Soup (1933) retired from the group and started his own acting agency. (also on a side note, the real life Zeppo was more like Francis than his one dimensional screen persona.)



Comparing the four brothers to the Marx Brothers seem like the obvious choice, but at times the brothers in Malcolm in the Middle can be very broad in the slapstick and the violence. So one would ask they be more similar to the Three Stooges? Well let's look into the chaotic trio and find out.

I think if there is one of similarity the two shows share is that they are underrated in comedy. I want to say that Malcolm was never the breakout hit like say, The Simpsons or All In the Family or even Roseanne. Still to this day there is only one season of the show has been out on DVD.

It is admired by fans but has never gotten the recognition it deserved. While the Three Stooges has a much bigger fan base than Malcolm In The Middle they are still not appreciated by the critics and the entertainment industry. The Ted Okuda/Edward Watz-penned book The Columbia Comedy Shorts puts the Stooges legacy in critical perspective:

"Many scholarly studies of motion picture comedy have overlooked the Three Stooges entirely—and not without valid reasoning. Aesthetically, the Stooges violated every rule that constitutes "good" comedic style. Their characters lacked the emotional depth of Charlie Chaplin and Harry Langdon; they were never as witty or subtle as Buster Keaton. They were not disciplined enough to sustain lengthy comic sequences; far too often, they were willing to suspend what little narrative structure their pictures possessed in order to insert a number of gratuitous jokes. Nearly every premise they have employed (spoofs of westerns, horror films, costume melodramas) has been done to better effect by other comedians. And yet, in spite of the overwhelming artistic odds against them, they were responsible for some of the finest comedies ever made. Their humor was the most undistilled form of low comedy; they were not great innovators, but as quick laugh practitioners, they place second to none. If public taste is any criterion, the Stooges have been the reigning kings of comedy for over fifty years."

They have not received any serious scholarly study on their brand of humor like say Charlie Chaplin. Actually that's not true they did received pne serious study in a book called Stoogeology: Essays on The Three Stooges Edited by Peter Seely and Gail W. Pieper that was released in 2007.

Another similarity is the violence that each group portray. While the Stooges' violence is more frequent and more cartoonish, Malcolm has it share of violent moments. In fact I believe that is why the channel, FX gave the show a 14 rating one time, because of the fighting that Reese, Malcolm, and Dewey do. When the reruns ran on Nick at Nite the rating dropped to a rating PG-L-V.

Now let's look at character similarities, we'll first look at Reese and Moe. There is no denying that Reese and Moe share common similarities. Essentially they are both bullies, but I think their motives are different. Moe bullies the Stooges around so he can be the leader and the brains of the group (even though he's just as or more so, destructive and stupid as the other two). Reese however just like to be bad just for the fun of it and sometimes bully his brothers to let them know he can do it, but Malcolm at times seems to override his tyranny.

This leads into Malcolm and Larry. Somehow at first glance it seems very unlikely because of the physical looks and the mental capacity they both differentiate. However they are both the middlemen of the three. However while Larry is a total doofus and a follower to the mayhem, Malcolm questions Reese's or Dewey's ambition with logic even though his smarts can be just as useful to Larry's brain size. If anything Larry and Malcolm represent the ego of their groups always skeptical for one time when hearing Moe's or Curly's schemes. (Ironically, Larry has his first and only starring role in the first Stooges short for Columbia, Women Haters (1934) in a sort of predicament that Malcolm would get in an episode of MITM.)


Dewey and Curly is the obvious chid in the group. They are the most mistreated in the group as well, they handle their fustrations much differently however. Curly tends to have more violent temper tantrums whether sliding his hands across his face or spinning on his side and abnormally calm in dangerous situations. Other than that both Curly and Dewy are rambunctious in their own way.

Well I covered the main three brothers, but what about Francis? I’m going on a limb and state that Francis is more like Shemp. Both are mischievous laid back sort of guys who are more worldly and a bit cynical than their brothers, Dewey and Curly. This comparison would fit Francis because of all the traveling he does throughout the seven seasons. The people that Francis meets could fit in easily in a Three Stooges two reeler. Just like Shemp, Francis could be quite cunning to his adversaries including his obsessive, overbearing mother!

Ironically Francis’ subplots in the show almost reminds me of Shemp doing solo work in films for W.C. Fields and Abbott and Costello, you could argue that Francis has his own show because of his separate misadventures from his family.
While I did do a comparison for the four main brothers I want to take a brief look at the supporting cast. The parents of the show really do feel like supporting characters from a Three Stooges short. Lois, the mother seems to embody every battle ax, scheming gold digger, and charming old mothers that the Three Stooges came in contact with.

Like the show, when women were in a Three Stooges short they would match or outmatch the three knuckleheads. Lois may not control the destruction of the brothers but she can outwit them on certain things like in The Red Dress 01x02 when she tries to punish the boys hard enough to see which one destroys each her dress.

Hal, the father is an interesting case. He seems to channel three different characters. One could say that Shemp reincarnated in this man because of the constant muggings and the double takes he convey throughout the show and couple the fact his ability to make use of his legs like Shemp does.

There’s also similarity to a Stooge actor named Emil Sitka who was always the Stooges major foil from Curly’s last short to Curly Joe. Just like Sitka, Hal always seem to wobble and warble along with having disorienting ribbons of doubt and a perpetual shadow of suspicion for the chaotic brothers.

And there is also a hint of Dudley Dickerson who was the most frequently seen black actor in the Three Stooges films. Both characters can be seen as skittish, bulging eyed cowards in a dire situation, (and its noted that Hal has black male friends he play poker with.) In a sense, actor Bryan Cranston could’ve been a perfect stooge if the real stooges were around.

Also worth noting is that another character in the show, Craig Feldspar is a dead ringer to Joe Besser because both are whiners and a cowards and bothare pudgy. In short, you could say that the episodes are like updated version of the Three Stooges shorts.
Even the theme music for both shows is funny in their own right. Both clearly show that both shows are childish and broad in their slapstick. The Three Stooges title card for each short has each Stooge showing off their emotions: Moe, angry; Larry; confused, Curly; indignant, and Shemp; estatic while Three Blind Mice or the Listen To The Mockingbird song playing in the background. MITM does something different with the opening credits and the song, Your Not The Boss of Me Now playing. We see clips of Anime and 1950s cult monster movies accompanying clips of madness from the family. This shows the wild and unpredictable nature show.

In short while the show do a possess some tomfoolery worthy of the Stooges I’m still going to side with the Marxes. Simply because the brothers seem consistently similar to the wacky personas of the Marxes. Also the writing on the show is just as sharp as a Marx Brothers film. Although both Malcolm and his brothers and the Marxes live in seperate eras they still cause mayhem and anarchy in American social values. I think author, Roy Blount Jr, author of his new book about Duck Soup called Hail, Hail Euphoria! that sums up the Marx Brothers but can also sum up the brothers from MITM as well:
" This is a family drama, a true bromance: brothers constantly rubbing each other the wrong way and giving each other a hard time but then rallying together when faced with a much larger opponent. (Blount 91) The way brothers fight compulsively, appetitively,because they can't help it. As they grow on each other they grow over against each
other. They get in each other's way, they pick on each other, they put each other
down, they look for excuses to regard each other as threats-thereby acquiring
moves not taught in the classroom but essential, if not necessarily salubrious, in life.
Brothers, usually, don't quite kill each other, but they do know each other perhaps
better than either would like.(Blount 118)."

Views: 7474

Tags: 1930s, 2000s, Brothers, In, Malcolm, Marx, Middle, Stooges, TV, The, More…Three, show, sitcom, the

Comment

You need to be a member of The Spill Movie Community to add comments!

Join The Spill Movie Community

Comment by Andrew Bee on October 19, 2010 at 4:37pm
YES they are great work
Comment by niall evans on October 12, 2010 at 8:16pm
Very detailed indeed i havnt seen much of the Marx brothers or the stooges but totally agree Malcolm in the middle hasnt gotten the recognition it deserves
Comment by Don Panini on October 12, 2010 at 7:51pm
Oh, Mr Gorog, I hope that day comes soon.

And I hope I get my own high horse when the day comes
Comment by C.H. Gorog on October 12, 2010 at 12:40am
PvtSnafu, while I don't agree on the comparisons of either the Stooges or the Marx brothers, this is a very analytical piece you've worked on. Nice to see a featured post of this quality!

Oh, Don, one day you'll have standards too.

@ZPowers - I agree. Arrested Development in the Naughts truly changed how comedy shows can be done, I would argue even more than Seinfeld.
Comment by ZPowers on October 11, 2010 at 9:54pm
IMO, no. MITM was no where near innovative enough to qualify with the Stooges or Marx, who really changed comedy. MITM was pretty traditional sitcom fare overall. The best written/acted and funniest dysfunctional family sitcom of the 2000s was Arrested Development, and its aftereffects can be seen in almost every sitcom today (handheld cam, insertion of other means of narration like photos and security cam, a joke style that is absurd, self-referencing style/callbacks and subtle looooong running jokes that they do not reintroduce with each callback, humor that ranges from circumstantial, a character actually being witty, observational, topical, and even absurd and random, and being almost devoid of characters who were ever intentionally funny). For the 90s, it was the Simpsons.

CONCLUSION: My opinion is that Arrested Development takes the cake as the dysfunctional family sitcom and revolutionary sitcom of the 2000s.
Comment by Don Panini on October 11, 2010 at 8:56pm
Good ol' C.H. Gorog.

Always on his high horse
Comment by C.H. Gorog on October 11, 2010 at 8:50pm
Neither, The Marx and The Three Stooges made me laugh.
Comment by RENEGADE™ on October 11, 2010 at 1:55pm
It defines an age in TV and seeing that Nintendo 64 really puts a time line on it LOL.
Comment by ▲UltraK.I.D.™▽ on October 10, 2010 at 4:43pm
Wow, I loved this...Malcom in the Middle is one of my favorite shows of all time and your post is very interesting...
Comment by Benjamin David on October 10, 2010 at 4:33pm
Wow, you put a lot of work into this, it's great I never thought about Malcolm in the Middle like the 3 Stooges. After reading your blog I can see where your coming from. Nice job great read, looking foreword to your next one.

© 2013   Created by The Spill Crew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service