
The Alien franchise is a gem. It's something to be treasured, despite the major flaws in the writing of the fourth entry. We treasure it because it gave us one of the most original and terrifying creatures in film history, it helped create names out of budding directors who now carry big sticks in Hollywood, and it never repeated itself. Each film has a distinct story, style, and setting, all of which create a realistic foothold to counter the nightmarish nature of the alien itself. These films, along with other examples like
The Thing and
Cloverfield, remind us how brilliant "monster movies" can be. This is why we treasure the Alien films, and why you should if you don't.
Fox has now decided to chip away at this treasure - not because they chose to make another Alien film, and certainly not because they chose to get Ridley Scott to return to the franchise. They are threatening the franchise because they have chosen to make this new film a prequel. It is without a doubt the most absurd decision they could have made regarding this new entry in the saga.
Why? Well, for starters, what the hell can the film possibly be about? Scott's original is about as concise as a monster movie can get in terms of establishing the monster and explaining its origins: a group of people encounter an alien organism that takes them down one by one. The great terror of the alien is its secrecy; it complements the monster's unbelievable appearance. Scott himself knew this when he made the first movie - he hid the creature as much as possible, knowing that your mind would make it scarier than it would ever be on its own. It was enough to know that this thing came from an egg buried in the darkness of another alien being's ruined ship. This knowledge acted as foreshadowing for what was in store for Sigourney Weaver and her chums.
ALIEN was the perfect set up. The perfect starting point.
This prequel has no purpose. There is no need to further explain away the alien's existence, and doing so will only rob it further of the terror that it once held back in 1979. As much as I
love Aliens and especially
Alien3, each sequel has chipped away at the alien's scariness by either explaining a tad too much (
Aliens basically shows the creature to be a space ant/termite) or showing the monster too much (
Alien: Resurrection, I find thee guilty). By making a prequel to
ALIEN, Fox will destroy all the mystery to this classic thing of nightmares, and the film - and the franchise - will suffer for it. Why Scott agreed to this, I have no idea.

If they had only chosen to make a sequel rather than a prequel, I would be much more optimistic. I was hoping that a great director could rebuild the franchise into something great again, but the problem is not with the franchise's origins. It's with its current state. Leave the roots of the franchise alone - that's the strongest part of the whole damn thing.
Not to mention...there's pretty much no possible way Ripley will be featured in this prequel at all (at least I hope they have enough sense to not even try to crowbar her in). So...what is there left to do? Show another random group of people get hunted down? That's repetitive and useless. Show the space jockey and all that? That would be too far out there to really appease anyone. Creating a concrete origin for the alien will be like showing exactly what made Anakin Skywalker become Darth Vader - yeah, parts of it might be neat, but the overall reaction will be one of disappointment and eventual criticism.
A sequel to
Alien: Resurrection with a new set of characters, without Ripley/Ripley8, set in space (not Earth), would be my suggestion for the franchise's future. A prequel will only weaken the foundation of this great creature and this treasured saga.
What do you people think?
You need to be a member of The Spill.com Movie Community to add comments!
Join this Ning Network