If it's crap ... We'll tell you
Satoshi posted a status
martin fry posted a status
Well, it looks like we really will be getting a sequel to 'Dumb and Dumber.' No. Matter. What. Earlier this year, it was reported the followup to the Farrelly Brothers' 1994 comedy was going to begin shooting next month. Then, however, it became uncertain as to whether or not the film would be happening at all. This uncertainty was augmented when Jim Carrey departed the project. Undaunted, costar Jeff Daniels insisted that the project was still moving forward. Now, Bobby Farrelly revealed the proposed plot in an interview. Here's what we can expect...
"I can tell you that there is no growth out of either one of them and it's 20 years later. What is funny about the original is that they're grown men who are complete losers and when the studio came to us about a sequel, we were like, 'Loads of kids are losers and they're dumb.' We didn't see any value in the sequel so we backed out of it, but now these guys are in regular life and they're still basically children at heart.The story revolves around the fact that one of them may have sired a child. They want to go and find the child because he's having a kidney problem and he wants to ask him for one of his kidneys."
This sequel has proven harder to kill than a T-1000. So one of them is going to have a kid? That seems like pretty standard sequel fare. The long-lost family member in need of a kidney has only really been done in 200 or so television shows and Hallmark Channel movies so that'll be...fun. I'm going to play devil's advocate for a moment. Let's say I'm a huge fan of 'Dumb and Dumber' and I can't wait to see a sequel. How could I possibly be on board if half the central dimwitted duo is absent? All the other reasons to abandon this project notwithstanding, it will not work without Carrey. The number one goal of the filmmakers at this point must be getting him back. Otherwise, this really is a doomed venture.
Am I wrong? Anyone want to make a case for the sequel sans Carrey? Who would you cast to replace him? What do you think of the plot?
Source: Digital Spy
Comment
Comment by J-Haze on August 24, 2012 at 2:49pm no carrey, no dice...
Comment by Zuri Ch on August 24, 2012 at 7:58am we shouldnt even be talking about this film if Carrey is not in it. End OF!
Comment by Mike Denney on August 23, 2012 at 4:22pm ONE MORE THING:
Some helpful 'plot suggestions', before the Farrelly's let this polished turd loose on us:
Think I'll post this here, and see if the movie I go watch looks anything like it. If so, I'll kindly accept around $2 to $5 million dollars for my 'finders fee' for saving this whole franchise. I'd put Steve Martin in charge of 'these two' actors for this movie, in fact, in a supervisory AND production role, and bet $1 million of that he'd blow us away (and Martin could design his own cameo, for that matter, which I'm sure would rival anything Stan Lee will ever do).
(Steve Martin has so much talent dripping out of him that he's never known what to do with it, himself--nor have we).
Comment by Mike Denney on August 23, 2012 at 3:56pm Also, I think the plot as it sits now sucks...IF either Lloyd or Harry needs a kidney, and wants to go get one from a supposed love child? What the hell? I've seen enough of Casey Anthony and other bad parenting, in the interim since the original movie, to think that can be funny.
Here's the thing: in "South Park: Bigger, Better, and Uncut"--I think Eric Cartman saving the world from a satanic apocalypse by using his foul mouth, is extremely funny, but in the same movie, I thought that some dumb U.S. general blowing Bill Gates' brains out because Windows was ruining their war, was a little bit over the top. When I saw that movie in the theater, that scene stopped a big crowd of college kids from enjoying the movie (you could hear a pin drop until the next scene, where they picked up again).
We're not going to see "Saw Pt. 23", "The Notebook", or even any other comedy, when we go see this one. We're going hoping to see some of the dumbest stuff ever filmed, without apology, hesitation, or self-absorption. We're going to laugh at ourselves, and also realize that any other person in the theater can and would do exactly the same stupid stuff, if they were behaving foolishly. Without calling these guys 'fools', we're laughing our asses off at just that exact trait.
Lloyd and Harry weren't 'retarded'--not even close. They didn't even have ADHD, or symptoms of mental illness (well, except the end, where Lloyd broke with reality and attacked Mary's hubby--and all those other times)...LOOK--we're not even going to worry about how much to pay.
Just make us laugh, guys--this aint no love-letter--just show us some more funny before it's far too late.
BTW, could you not guess? "Dumb and Dumber" is my favorite movie.
Comment by Mike Denney on August 23, 2012 at 3:39pm no, NO, NOOO! Don't tell me Carrey's off this project!? Peter Farrelly was just on TV last month stating very clearly that "I can tell you this, that both the original actors, Carrey and Daniels, are back in on this one"; "the first one was done [poorly and too quickly]", etc.
When are the Farrelly's going to realize that Jim Carrey IS Lloyd Christmas?!
If you can't get them both, don't do it...it's like the Odd Couple done without either Klugman or Randall--you just can't do it to people any more. This isn't 'TV', it's 'the movies'. It's your biggest film, no matter what you indulge yourself to believe, ever, and therefore, IF and WHEN you decide to go frikking with it, you're compromising whatever you're making next.
@Farrellys: You 'effed' up once, by selling out the 2nd one, so go hit Jim Carrey on his head with a big fake hammer, or some public stunt--anything to realize that his sh*t DOES stink, and precisely like Eddie Murphy, Adam Sandler, and so many other comedic 'actors', his fame and success were based on something called 'funny', and if they do not cease with their pathetic attempts at making money over substance, they will fail epicly until they die, leaving VH1 with nothing to mention but tragedy in their last several DECADES of work!
@Carrey: Quit screwing your fan base. Stop it, stop it, stop it. You are so very lucky that your fans loved you in "In Living Color", and you've been essentially hating your fortune for the past 10 movies, since you tried forcing us all to commit suicide for loving you in 'The Cable Guy', and WAY before. Nobody cared for anything you did before you went haywire as 'Fireman Bill' in 'ILC', and since then, it's like you've been despising your gift. It's not like we're asking you to be 'in character' [i.e. 'dumb'] all the time--and God forbid you think your audience for these films is poking fun at anyone with any kind of mental illness, or deficit, of any kind. You OWN the character Lloyd Christmas, who in turn, OWNS something so irrationally, ridiculously DUMB, that it is simply indescribable.
I swear, if they frik this one up, fans should buy out the franchise and make it so that nobody else can ruin it again--it's 2nd only to Spielberg and Lucas's 'redos' in selfish, empty behavior, to even be letting your fan-base worry over it.
It was a VERY funny movie--maybe the funniest ever, for so many reasons, I'd sound EVER WORSE by going over them anywhere. To me, it is a hallowed trip into the best humor that helped me along through a very depressing decade, and since, and all involved should realize it's value as such, and quit freaking ruining it, over and over.
Anyone really wanting to realize what a gem we have here need only watch the 'Special Features' shorts on the original DVD, to see how close they came to naming it something sounding like it would win a Foreign Film award (and so be very forgettable), how close they came to not getting Jeff Daniels to play Harry (due to Carrey's supposed reputation of 'owning' every scene, which all thought would be off-putting to Daniels' sensibilities on set); they--and so, we--really did luck out on this one.
It's like everybody in the whole entire world finding a 200 carat ruby in their backyard, even if it's a dumpster.
Don't ruin that, for any reason, at any cost--you'll have deprived the world of something it really needs more than ever right now.
Comment by Austen Messick on August 23, 2012 at 2:54pm The chemistry between the two main actors is what made that movie work. Without Carrey, it would be difficult. I was a huge Jim Carrey fan when I was a kid but I find him annoying now. But, he is really talented. No one can take that away. Steve Martin is also very talented but makes some really awful movie decisions (most likely base on how many Edward Hopper paintings it can buy). Saying that, both will probably be in a few more things that will knock our socks off.
You can't have that much talent without it shining through.
Comment by Hector Fernando Andrade JR. II on August 23, 2012 at 2:31pm @gorillahandz: Mr. Popper's Penguins made a total $210,798,534 dollars so the movie was a hit.
Comment by gorillahandz on August 23, 2012 at 2:08pm I would say Jim Carrey's career hasn't exactly been on fire lately (Mr. Popper's Penguins...really?) so it totally makes sense he would do this if the $$$ was right. Also, according to IMDB he is attached to the project (take that for what it is worth).
Comment by Hector Fernando Andrade JR. II on August 23, 2012 at 2:08pm No one can replace Jim Carrey.
This plot sounds terrible.
Comment by D.F.W.J a.k.a Captain Fuck You! on August 23, 2012 at 12:18pm No one can replace Carrey so, if they cant bring him back(which IDK what I feel about this) I know for surre I aint watching this shit.
© 2013 Created by The Spill Crew.
You need to be a member of The Spill Movie Community to add comments!
Join The Spill Movie Community