Comment

Comment by Moeez on November 22, 2009 at 11:24am

I've never heard of "4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days" but now I'll check it out. Thanks, critics!

Comment by The Adventures of Stain-Boy on November 22, 2009 at 9:05am

Glad to see Mulholland Drive up there

Comment by Winner of Red Shirt Survivor on November 20, 2009 at 7:32pm

Glad to see Minority Report and Eternal Sunshine get some love.

Comment by ragman on November 20, 2009 at 6:34pm

michael phillips, the critic whose taste makes absolutely no god-damn sense.

Comment by Ryan on November 18, 2009 at 10:23pm

For anyone with Netflix you can 'Watch Instantly' 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days

Comment by Dr. Detfink on November 18, 2009 at 8:25pm

I think people are forgetting Siskel and Ebert HATED a lot of films that today people love. Blade Runner is one that both particularly hated but later went back and sort of softened their stance as time went on. Also let's not forget Ebert gave the modern incarnation of the Honeymooners a big thumbs up.

I did like Roeper who called out Ebert a lot of times.

Philips is VERY good in those lightning round reviews. As for Scott, he's not bad. He's a better writer but I do enjoy his video reviews on the NY times.

Comment by thejon93rd on November 18, 2009 at 2:53pm

I agree, Charlton. Although that isn't much of a compliment, considering how bad the "Two Bens" really were, I still enjoy watching these guys. It's nice to see that they're continuing the tradition of actually critiquing movies, instead of talking about: "Who's getting paid what", and all that tabloid mumbo-jumbo.

Comment by Charlton on November 18, 2009 at 2:27pm

Phillips and Scott are WAY, WAY better than those two um Ben guys before them. That said, Siskel and Ebert are the best.

Comment by JC on November 18, 2009 at 9:09am

Hmm, I'm curious now for that romanian movie