Comment

Comment by Crazypants on July 27, 2012 at 4:42am

@OperaW

Well that's simply not true, vehicular homicide is not a term made up by me. Even if no one ever used a car as a murder weapon, the intent doesn't make people killed by cars any less dead.

Also I'm sure there are far more people who use knives with the intent to murder, so now we should ban all knives?

Comment by Jordan101 on July 26, 2012 at 4:41pm

give people access to guns and innocent people will be shot , give people access to knifes and innocent people will get stabbed , give people access to cars and innocent people will be run over. Sadly this is all apart of life and always has been ,but ask yourself will you really care about the poor people killed a year from now ? or will just forget about it as soon as something harsher happens?

Comment by OperaW on July 26, 2012 at 2:49pm

@ Crazypants. The one thing you are missing in your argument is intent. No one goes out with their car intending to kill anyone, yet the percentage of people intending to kill with a gun is far higher.

Comment by Crazypants on July 26, 2012 at 6:41am

@Leon

Yes I did, see I can argue like this too, oh wait that's not arguing is it? I don't think you'd take me seriously if I'd just say "gun control doesn't work, it's a fact" and left it at that? Then why shouldn't the same apply to you?

Seriously, I did give a real live example of an assault rifle used in self defense and I showed you examples of things that would have had to be, at one point, argued for without any precedence. The fact something lacks precedence does not invalidate that thing. If it did, then concepts like gay/women/black/etc rights would have been invalid at the day at their inception, since they would have no precedence and would only have hypothetical arguments for them.

And yes I compared car deaths to gun deaths as cars kill far more people than guns do, even in the US. Whether or not cars are designed to kill, like guns are, is irrelevant of the fact that they DO kill more people. Again appeals to ridicule seem to be your only form of tackling any argument I make, shame that my opinion of you as a reasonable person grows ever lower by each comment. And please spare me the snide comment about how my opinion means little to you, you're getting a bit a predictable.

Comment by Patrick Abold on July 26, 2012 at 2:58am

Man, I loved TDKR. Watched it twice now.  When's the spoiler podcast coming out?

Comment by Leon on July 26, 2012 at 2:12am

@ Crazypants - Um, no, you kinda didn't demonstrate that at all. What you DID do was compare a gun to a car without the leasr bit of irony or selfreflection.

Comment by iZZi on July 26, 2012 at 12:16am

Awkward Silence @102:40ish

Comment by iZZi on July 25, 2012 at 11:32pm

About the spot for Comic Con next year, let's throw a spillio fund raisers or something!

Comment by Silent Protagonist on July 25, 2012 at 8:44pm

Terrorist(as defined by Oxford):a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.

So senseless killing by a guy that claimed to be the Joker doesn't qualify as terrorism, he needed to have terror as his goal not as side effect.

Comment by VinnyLT on July 25, 2012 at 7:07pm

Niggas never listen. SMH

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 29
• Next ›
• Page