Comment

Comment by Jedifarce on January 9, 2013 at 9:05pm

@the "other" will smith

Those are excellent points about Korey's lifestyle. Isn't that how it usually is with liberals, do as I say not as I do. Problem with Korey he lives in a fantasy world that Spill.com is entirely comprised of teenagers and 20 something year-olds which he can browbeat into submission with his general ignorance. Conservatives are more learned than he is willing to believe, Korey's pretty much bought into the idiocy if one conservative makes a ridiculous statement then they all must think alike. I tend to believe in Korey's case, if you don't ingest enough protein your brain starts to shrink. As far as Korey goes when it comes to political commentary, he's as insightful as fecal matter baking on the sidewalk in the noonday sun. 

 I actually like Leon, but he seems to much of a yes-man to challenge his boss. Billy is nothing more than bully always picking on weaker individuals like Alan. While Co-host might get things wrong from time to time, I'm a fan of his, he's not a A-hole like Korey's turning out to be with his weekly tirades on conservatives and the right wing. 

Comment by Jedifarce on January 9, 2013 at 1:12pm

@the "other" will smith Clearly you don't comprehend how stricter gun control laws will help keep firearms out of criminals hands. I guess you're just not as brilliant as our mindless leader and savior Korey Coleman.

http://fox4kc.com/2013/01/07/thieves-break-into-police-sheriff-cars...

Comment by Jedifarce on January 9, 2013 at 6:43am

"Tim K. enters the school armed with a Beretta that he appears to have taken from his parents' bedroom. His father is a member of a gun club and appears to possess the weapons legally."

He killed 15 people with that one 9mm handgun.

Clearly more gun laws would've prevented that tragedy, right Korey Coleman? 

Comment by Jedifarce on January 9, 2013 at 6:28am

@http://my.spill.com/profile/Kelly94

Seeing how you're probably some chick and a puerile lefty, debating logic with you will probably prove futile and pointless but here goes.

Stricter gun laws and putting less guns out there will, by plain statistics, reduce the amount of crazies getting a hold on them.

Ignoring the fact that there are approximately 200,000,000 firearms owned by Americans out there now, how exactly is this expected to work logically? By less guns do you mean restricting the amount of firearms a law abiding citizen is able to purchase annually or own currently? Perhaps you would like to see ownership of firearms become illegal and you intend to confiscate the 200 million firearms that are out there already? Much like our resident genius Korey Coleman, your statements lack any specifics on what steps would be taken to create this brainless, liberal gun-free utopia. 

The guy that did this got the guns from his mom's personal collection, if it wasn't permitted for her to have those he wouldn't have had access to them, is that coherent enough for you?

Actually it isn't. Again, are you advocating the outright ban of firearms for every American citizen? This is the position you are suggesting is it not. Therefore, no American law abiding citizen would be "permitted" to own a single firearm in hope of preventing a mass shooting from ever occurring. Okay, let's indulge in this Korey Coleman idiocy for the time being and proclaim from this day forward all guns are banned and everybody must relinquish any firearm in their possession or face a prison sentence. Let us even go as far in this farcical liberal fantasy all guns are confiscated and throw into an incinerator then recycled into electric cars. Will the mass murders suddenly disappear forevermore? News flash, the bad guys will just adopt  IEDs or chemical weaponry to accomplish their aims. Remember 9/11? 3000 people were murdered without the use of a single firearm. The Oklahoma City truck bomb killed 168, shouldn't we ban truck bombs too....oh that's right it's already illegal to do that. Gee I wonder if stricter truck bomb laws would've prevented that tragedy? I

It's no surprise liberals are stupid. 

Comment by Carnage Kosmic on January 8, 2013 at 10:28pm

Honestly looking back at all this gun violence and people blaming video games, I live in Canada and we don't have a right to bear arms. We do have every Call of Duty, Mass Effect, and movie Americans do. I can only remember one time where someone in my country went on mass shooting spree whereas there's been how many in the U.S. in the past year alone? If video games make people violent why doesn't it happen in Canada? Or better yet, why doesn't it happen in Japan or China where hundreds of millions play Starcraft yet has there ever been a mass shooting like this? You don't need more than a couple of bullets to keep yourself and your family safe, not a fully automatic assault rifle or multiple hand guns. 

Comment by Kelly on January 3, 2013 at 11:32pm

@Jedifarce

It won't completely get rid of people still misusing them, but making them less easily available WILL reduce it by a lot, it's a proven thing. That's plenty of lives saved, talking like it's ineffective because it doesn't get rid of it 100% is beyond arrogant and dismissive. You're so self-righteous but can't grasp this simple thing. Stricter gun laws and putting less guns out there will, by plain statistics, reduce the amount of crazies getting a hold on them.

The guy that did this got the guns from his mom's personal collection, if it wasn't permitted for her to have those he wouldn't have had access to them, is that coherent enough for you?

Comment by Jedifarce on January 1, 2013 at 1:24am

After listening to Koreys protracted rant on firearms being the problem, as with most liberals, he didn't offer a single coherent reason how banning firearms would've prevented the massacre or prevent future incidents from reoccurring. 

 Only thing I got out of that idiotic discussion was that conservatives are stupid and Korey's smarter than anybody else. The guns are already out there, unless you ban every single firearm on the market and confiscate every gun in America from each law abiding citizen, guess what Korey, it's going to happen again.

Comment by Jedifarce on January 1, 2013 at 1:09am

Leon - "the whole idea you're going to protect yourself from the government, I'm like try it, see how long that lasts." Apparently, Leon isn't up to speed on current events in Syria. 

Comment by ilia katritch on December 30, 2012 at 8:27pm

@the "other" will smith

you know Aristotle was wrong about everything. He said that objects stop moving because they become tired, and that heavier objects fall faster.

Also, we don't take drugs off the market when 1 person dies from it. We take a drug off the market when hundreds of people die from it every year, except cigarettes, alcohol, and guns. Because the U.S. is addicted to these things and cant bear to get rid of them.

Comment by The Glorious Tachikoma on December 29, 2012 at 12:41am

@ Alan:

In my moderacy I find myself agreeing with your sentiments and in truth that would solve many problems. However, simply requiring someone to sign an agreement to have a locked gun cabinet/take safety courses/not possess guns around at-risk individuals would be no more effective than the current 4473 form one fills out when buying a gun at licensed retailer. In order to effectively implement such requirements we would need a national gun owner registry similar to Illinois' FOID. The thing is that that clashes with the sentiments of a majority of hunters or sports shooters who agree with banning 'assault weapons'. A new AWB would pass before a national gun owner ID. And as you seem to have agreed, that would solve nothing significant.

@ theotherWillSmith

I think that it is slightly unfair to directly compare the number of alcohol-involved road deaths to firearms homicides. The former is negligence, the latter is direct intent, which aren't the same things. I compared drunk driving to assault weapons to illustrate a point about dangerous things and the cost of freedom, not that alcohol is worse than guns. (not that I don't think it is, but that's a subjective view). And your numbers are off. in 2011 the 8583 was homicides committed with handguns. Total firearms homicides overall was something like 12,000. Just making sure people quote the correct numbers.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 21
• Next ›
• Page