hey dude i saw something and thought of you, hope this makes you laugh

im supposed to take someone's opinion seriously when he considers 300 to be a decent film??? and a gun nut to boot?? please stop responding to anything i put on this site...

i posted this on my page for some reason and only realized today.

read this link, even i learned something from this, and it is directly about the cambrian explosion and the 'sudden' increase in life, it is not in depth but if you take a look at the bibliography it is extensive.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC300.html


if you have time this is a very in-depth scientific paper on evolution as common descent, it has taught me a lot already and i am still reading through it.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

but you are right we are going in circles, this is stuff i have shown you before, if you really wanted to learn you would have either already read at least some of the links i have sent you, but you are clearly not interested in that, good luck and see you in the forums.

peace

more specifically this why oxygen is important.

http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/1997-05/862178472.Es.r.html

http://www.ucop.edu/sciencetoday/article/21507

how many times do i have to say this, i gave you factual information and links to web sites by well respected scientific institutes and you reject it, you show me time and time again that you lack a proper understand of not just evolution but simple biology, there is considerable evidence to prove my point thats why i believe there is no faith required at all.

and yes you have struck a chord,you know nothing of what you talk about but act like you have a greater knowledge of biology, but when you ask question like why did an increase in oxygen increase the development of life, all it does is show my that you are scientifically illiterate, i can't be bothered to debate with you, a normal rational person would have seen that the evidence weights so heavily in the favor of evolution only someone who actively is trying to deny it, could deny it.

here are some websites and links if this doesn't convince you i quit, i finally got bored of debating with some one as closed minded and ignorant as you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/index.html

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/

http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_fact-and-theory.html

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117958524/home?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/evolution.html

http://www.newscientist.com/topic/evolution

http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0014-3820

http://books.google.com/books?id=HCh7n6zuWeUC&dq=evolution&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=MTT3uNE_hA&sig=XZ_G-eHWN5-HKzRgN-GROgzTg6c&hl=en&ei=SYkOS9LyK5CB4QaJ37WWBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CBoQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=&f=false

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-evolution.html

http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/

http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/lenski.html

Yeah. Thanks for the reply. I just wanted to know what your perspective is.

dude you always say some thing is far fetched, well believing in magic is far fetch to me, i find it far more believable that life developed over hundreds of millions of years than we come from two super-humans that were simple conjured into existence. but thats just me.

the video i referred to was actually posted by chig, the one post on you page was to show how strobel was not capable of making comment on biology due to his lack of knowledge on the subject.

ok as i understand it due to an increase in the level of oxygen in the sea probably due to increases in life forms like plankton, life was able to develop at a rate which had not been possible before, over 40 millions years (which is a long time with the possibility for million and million of generation to develop) we got the a lot more varieties of fish life. and also due to the emergence of solid bodied fish e.i crustacean etc there could be fossilized where the completely soft bodies one could not. but the cambrian period did not create all life on the planet at this point there was still no really life on land that came later. i hope that answered your question.

i apologies if the video insulted you but all it does is show how creationist science is wrong on many level both scientifically and mathematically.

i really don't get it man you want to know about the cambrian exposition so i give you a video to watch about that time by a man whose knowledge is better than mine and you don't watch it, you are making the debate personal, and you constantly move the goal post, just because i can not personal answer a question of your to the special extent you have chosen doesn't mean evolution is wrong.

in england we don't have a strong politically active christian right like in america so our education systems has not under attack by anti intellectuals for the last hundred years, in england science class teaches evolution as the only true theory we only learn about other theories which came before to examine how they were wrong, darwin is on our £10 note, it is only really in america that there is this perceived idea that evolution is not correct and only among members of the christian right.

and how am i pompous you are the one claiming to have a better position to comment on this field of science than the people who studied to be in it and dedicate there life to the understanding of evolution, that pompous, that ignorant.