Call of Duty World at War will be better than Call of Duty 4

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by C.H. Gorog on October 26, 2008 at 7:15pm

Perhaps there will be a "Kiether Sutherland tackles a Christmas tree minigame". Just my hope.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Shininggold on November 17, 2008 at 10:21pm

Nah, flamethrowers are such a stupid concept, I mean, it's just ONE weapon! Why do I need to keep hearing about it? Plus, almost EVERY game promises intelligent enemies. I doubt it will be anything notable.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Antonio on November 24, 2008 at 12:57pm

Now that the game is out and I can say, no, I don't think it's better than COD 4. I mean why go back to WW2??
It's a good game, but not better than 4, in my opinion.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by MyWifeDave on December 10, 2008 at 5:14pm

No its not. Sadly. The have taken the very game Call of Duty 4 and just added stupid errors and mistakes while ignoring the original mistakes to make a passable but ultimately flawed game.
They coppied the game but did nothing to improve to little mistake. Im not talking about the setting or other things that different people would think differently on; Im talking about the actual errors in the game.

Try playing through the story mode on a high difficulty and you will realise how very stupid the Friendly AI is, Im no marines but Im sure they didn't teach "push your team mate out of cover to save your life" at paris island.

▶ Reply to This