My Thoughts On Star Trek Into Darkness (Huge Spoilers Ahead)
First off, Star Trek Into Darkness is not as good as it's preceding film, but it's still an…See More
The Spill Movie Community
If it's crap ... We'll tell you
Follow Spill!
Latest Activity
Slender Dan posted a status"Still can't see that twig, Zoe Saldana, playing Gamora. Horrible choice."
FalseFace posted a status"Got my first HD TV yesterday and a free modded Wii. DL'ing Metroid Prime Trilogy and Resident Evil 4 RIGHT NOW."
Satoshi posted a status"I wonder if I did something? I'm getting strange Emails from an SNS called Fuckbook."
CelticPredator posted a discussionOogieloves and the Great Balloon Murder Mystery- Parody Trailer
I figured I'd share this little video I made after watching The Oogieloves for the first time.…See More
The Phenomenal One posted a blog postMovie Spoilers Episode 60
In episode 60 we go over more Iron Man 3 (Really people still?) The Great Gatsby (Still?), Drew…See More
Photos
Music
whose gonna be the next villain in the dark knight 3?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Scrump Bolymeux on -
It'll be Batman.
-
Permalink Reply by the_eccentric on -
say that to my face than we'll see what happens
-
Permalink Reply by MDS on -
Uh, probably not a goddamn thing seeing as how you are too fucking stupid to realize that "Dark Knight 3" is never going to happen. After all, the Dark Knight Rises is already the "third movie"... which aren't even all called "Dark Knight" to begin with.
Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises.... Uh, yep, that's the 3 "Nolan Batman Movie" and all you are going to get. Nolan's already said he was done making "batman movies"... and Warner Brothers has already announced that they are going to work on a "reboot" of the Batman franchise after this one is done. Why? Well, some say Justice League... others are saying because WB needs another "reboot" of Batman to carry on after Nolan's involvement... and others are saying it's because WB are cash-grabbing and hoping to fool retarded little shitheads into theaters thinking that the rebooted Batman would be part of the "Nolan universe". Clearly by your question, you fall into the retarded little shitheads section.
-
Permalink Reply by the_eccentric on
-
Well duh faggot, thats the whole point of showing JGLs character at the end. That kicks off the next batman movie starring the joseph gordon levitt as bat man to be in the justice league movie. The only reason chris nolan isnt directing the next dark knight movie is so he can direct the justice leauge movie himself. .
-
Permalink Reply by the_eccentric on
-
bro nunchuks are so badass the bat man should use it to beat the bain up.
-
Permalink Reply by MDS on
-
Sigh, I should have remembered that so many retarded people are using the internet. I shouldn't even bother, but here goes...
1) As Arctic Douche pointed out. Nolan isn't directing the Justice League movie. He's publicly admitted to not be involved in that whole project. He's not writing, directing, producing or even thinking about it. Hell, it's not even sure if Warner Brothers is going to be able to actually put one together at this point. Not until they are able to reboot Batman, Superman, release a Wonder Woman movie, and possibly pray for a good Green Lantern sequel (if they are even going to bother with one) or simply reboot the Green Lantern with another movie. So, already showing how unaware you are, by simply making that statement.
2) "the Joseph Gordon Levitt as bat man"? What the fuck are you talking about? "the Joseph"? As compared to what, a copycat Joseph? Or do you assume there are more than one version of Joseph Gordon Levitt and have to establish which is the first one by using "the" in front of his name? Or do you think that Joseph Gordon Levitt describes his job, therefor you have to establish some form of distinction by using "the" in front of it? And let's say that miracles of miracles that he's actually cast as the Batman character. You really expect someone who is barely 5'10" is going to be able to provide a physically intimidating character? Who the fuck is he going to fight? Fucking midgets or children? Sorry, but as good of an actor as Mr. Levitt may be, he's not able to get the physical aspects of a character of Batman. So, that's not going to work even in your own personal wetdreams of fanboy asslicking.
3) bro nunchuks are so badass the bat man should use it to beat the bain up. What the fuck does that even mean? The proper word is "nunchaku", or if you want to use the bastardized english version... Nunchucks. A "nunchuk" is what the Japanese have used to indicate the Wii's controls. So, by your own words you are wanting bat man to use the Wii controls to fight with? Also, it should have been written as "Bro, nunchucks are so badass. The bat man (Which is again wrong... It should have simply been "Batman" -- one word, without using "the") should use them (again, as the word is used to describe 2 sticks joined by a chain... therefor the proper terminology is using the plural format) to beat Bane (at least you should have been able to spell the guy's name right instead of using the spelling that means "a bath"in Holland) down (As it's impossible to beat someone "upward", nor is it possible to beat *object* direction. You have to beat *direction* then subject of the beating. ). So, your last statement should have been at least put together something like this.... "Bro, nunchucks are so badass. Batman should use them to beat down Bane.
Again, the more you post... the more it looks like you still fall into that third category. The retarded little shitheads.
-
Permalink Reply by the_eccentric on
-
Relax, I made the topic as a joke MDS. I thought it was fairly obvious but considering I baited you into making two fairly lengthy posts apparently it was not.
Also my reply to Spill's Nerdy Film Critic was used to point out the blatant irony of his idiotic statement. Notice how he confused then/than just like I purposely did in my reply.
© 2013 Created by The Spill Crew.
