Yes, it's true. Warner Bros. have announced their plans to make another film based on "IT," a famous novel by Stephen King. During the late 80's, a straight-to-t.v. movie based on the book was released.
It is now considered to be one of the scariest t.v. movies ever made. The question is this: is it time for this story to be told on the big screen?
I think the problem with certain stephen king books, you need that 4 hours to completely get the story. To fleash out the characters, could a 2-2 1/2 hour version could do the job; perhaps depending on the script. Still the original adaption from the 80s will be my favorite.
Cybersoldier is right, the only thing is, "IT" was already a four movie and still didn't do the novel justice. Imagine it being cut down to 2-21/2 hour.
I am really sceptical that a 2-2 1/2 version would do justice to the novel, I liked the Salem's Lot adaptation though. Wonder if anyone caught that movie?
These days it seems everybody and their brother from film geek to casual movie goer has been heard saying remakes suck. I've heard some people say its a crime that some are even made. Why is that exactly? In some cases do people say that on the va...