Follow Spill!

Latest Activity

Crazypants posted a status
"Just wanted to remind people again of the loading bar petition. http://ning.it/12ES0E6 Only 28 ppl away from reaching it's goal!"
27 minutes ago
Cammix joined Havoc's group
Thumbnail

The Fixers

Inspired by Korey's recent rant about necessary improvements to the site, How to make Spill the…See More
30 minutes ago
Abby Soto posted photos
50 minutes ago
Profile IconDan MIller, JackieChon, KillerCharlie and 7 more joined The Spill Movie Community
56 minutes ago
EMZreviews posted a blog post

SIDE EFFECTS (e-Review)

(Dr. Watson is about to see you now, Ms. Salander)…See More
1 hour ago
Gift of the Magi posted a status
"Eldar Pre-Order list dropped yesterday. The Eldar got a Titan. A FUCKING TITAN!"
1 hour ago
Dr.Horrible posted a status
"This is a bad time for Spill all together. First, well everything that went down and now Kevin lost his mother. Thoughts go out to him."
1 hour ago
nangle posted a photo
1 hour ago

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Music

Loading…

Through the history of film, most people followed one of the golden rule of movies. Don't show kids dying in gruesome deaths/or at all in your movie. Well i'm guessing it's a golden rule. I mean who wants to see a cute little kid get shot in the face or get axed by some mask killer? In  most movies kids from the age of 0 to 14 usually never die. The reason  while i'm talking about this is because I recently watched the movie Feast, and in the movie Feast, I saw a kid getting eaten alive by some gruesome monster. I mean you hear the kid scream and see him kicking as he gets eaten alive. I found it to be horrible to see something like that happen. I know it's just a movie, but thats taking it too far. I can't watch any kid die like that in a movie, having little brothers at that age. So what do you think?

Tags: Feast, Gruesom, Kids

Views: 73

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't have anything against kids getting killed in movies on principle, but the problem seems to me that the only reason most filmmakers do it is for the shock value from the act of killing a child. Not because it was a character you cared about or because it was someone whom one of the other leads cared about, but because they want to be "edgy".
In such cases I'm against killing kids in movies, simply because it's a cheap tactic, in the same way any unnecessary character death is. However, if you manage to build a child character whose death is imperative to build upon the film's mood or theme, to further character progression, or as a turning point for the plot, sure, go ahead.

Yes.

Yes.

RSS

© 2013   Created by The Spill Crew.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service