Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Tumah on September 23, 2010 at 9:10am

My wallet is getting hurt.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by That Guy, Jord on September 23, 2010 at 4:45pm

I am seriously still waiting to see a film which has been made beeter due to the fact it is in 3D! including avatar, the 3D did not make the film better for me, All 3D does is give me a head ache and takes me out of the story!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by B.O.B 9000 on September 23, 2010 at 5:03pm

Totally agree about 3D taking you out of the story. It doesn't give me a headache as much as it bores me out of my skull and consistently annoys me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joanne on September 23, 2010 at 5:13pm

I wouldn't mind it if it was being used for a purpose, but it isn't. I think it's being thrown around and overused, with most films in 3D being unnecessary. It's a popular gimmick right now and it'll be used anywhere as long as it brings in the big money, which it is doing right now. Unfortunately, I didn't get to see Avatar in 3D (but heard from friends it was a great experience). I actually thought the 3D in Up was used to good effect. But that's about it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thom Florio on January 12, 2013 at 9:45pm

Yes, Up used 3D excellently!  I did leave Avatar with a two-day migraine, however.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TheLizardhead on May 21, 2011 at 1:20am

It's depends on how you use it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by DarkProphet94 on May 21, 2011 at 12:43pm

the only films ive seen in 3D were Spy Kids 3D (which i guess the 3D stood for 3 piles of Dogshit) and Avatar (which i thought complemented the mocap and digital effects successfully). aside from not seeing How to Train Your Dragon in 3D (which i heard was better than Avatar), i dont really give a shit about it. The only way im ever going to see movie in 3D again is if i hear The Hobbit or The Adventures of Tintin uses spectacular 3D

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by WallyTv on May 23, 2011 at 4:23am

I dislike 3d too! I think with too much technology people will start to ignore the movie itself. i prefer those movies with good plot and character but not just good picture or good sound...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Hector Fernando Andrade JR. II on June 6, 2011 at 2:25pm

I have to admit that back in the good old days the 3-D in Spy Kids 3-D Game Over sucked because Robert Rodriguez used the traditional anaglyph projection instead of using James Cameron's polarized projection only viewable in special venues.

 

 

But now 3-D has improved thanks to RealD 3-D. I love seeing animated movies that have effective 3-D. The only live-action movies that should be in effective 3-D are the Avatar trilogy because some live-action movies that I have seen in RealD 3-D have little 3-D unlike animated movies.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Iron Man on January 11, 2013 at 5:19pm

I have been purposefully seeking out films in 2d for the last year or so instead of just going to see it in 3d.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thom Florio on January 12, 2013 at 9:42pm

I am a 3D fanatic/enthusiast but by now, I am so burnt out seeing every fifth movie coming out in 3D.  However, movies like Tangled and How to Train Your Dragon were really special seen in 3D.  Conversion 3D movies, however, I totally detest. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page