If it's crap... We'll tell you

What zombies you like best?

Now im a big fan of this kind of horror flicks, and with the more recent adaptations of old classics they started to show others kinds of zombies. My question is simple: what kinds of zombie do you like best?
For what I can tell, there are 3 kinds of zombies (they all eat us so it’s more of the way they act before they eat our brains):

- Slow ass zombies: The kind you can sit and watch the entire LOTR extend editions before they can catch you. Basically appear in the old Romero movies

- The fast and the furious zombies: The kind that can run faster than YOU on roller skates. Saw them on the remake of Dawn of the Dead

- The half smart zombies : The kind that can actually talk with other zombies and hold guns and shoot you in the legs before they start having lunch. Seen on "The Land of the Dead"

I’ve got a thing for the kind of slow ass zombies that I can bash a couple of them before getting eaten, but you tell me which do you like most, and if im forgetting any other kind of zombies just point them out.

muuuusssttt eeeeaaatttt bbbbbbbbbbrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Iffy on April 5, 2008 at 7:26pm: Slow zombies are usually the way to go.

Fast zombies add tension, but the remake for Dawn of the Dead pales comparison to the original.

"Smart zombies" is an oxymoron.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Spectre on April 5, 2008 at 9:33pm: i personally like the remake very much. i guess the fact that it takes place in wisconsin is a added bonus for me.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by JudyIsabel on April 5, 2008 at 10:15pm: This is vampirela for the record LOL..thanks for saying I'm smart..moahahaha.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Justin on April 5, 2008 at 9:53pm: I like slow zombies better because they're pretty much the true original zombie, and to me a zombie should be a slow, rotting, mass of flesh slowly swarming around their victim before devouring them, and too how the hell can a corpse run fast their falling apart from decay (This of course excludes recently infected zombies I guess it would make sense for them to limp or stumble quickly). Semi-smart zombies are just ''comical'' to me. A corpse shooting a gun come on..........; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by JudyIsabel on April 5, 2008 at 10:19pm: Nah..I still say vampires are better for simple fact they will suck the blood out of ya moaahahaha.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by corey vire on April 6, 2008 at 3:49am: vampires are wimps. oh no garlic.. aaaa a cross. aw crap holy water. not to mention that whole aversion to sunlight thing. zombies a cool/scary due to the fact that there are not to many wanna be zombies like there are vampire groupies. zombie lovers wanna put bullets into the heads of the monsters we love not become them. Plus they never stop coming . ever. you might talk a vampire out of eating you but zombies know only the need to feed.

fast zombies are only medically possible 24-48 hours after death due to early rigormortis(BUT) with no aerobic activity they are nearly impossible.

SLOW ZOMBIES RULE!!!!; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by PREÐATOR on April 6, 2008 at 3:54am: fast zombies are only medically possible 24-48 hours after death due to early rigormortis(BUT) with no aerobic activity they are nearly impossible.

Egh...it's called fantasy.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by corey vire on April 6, 2008 at 3:53pm: i know i know.... i'm just saying. . wait this coming from an alien big game hunter....??? oh riiiiight its fantasy.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by EdMuzick on April 6, 2008 at 12:45am: Tough call.

The "slow zombie" movie is much more claustrophobic, and takes its sweet time trapping you.

But, the first time I saw "28 Days Later," and the fast zombies start tearing after people, I was jumping out of my seat.; ▶ Reply to This