Sequals that shouldn't have been made

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by MiCaH on March 29, 2008 at 12:12pm

Blair Witch Project 2 (and the original shouldn't have been made to begin with)
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (if the second didn't have a "to be continued" ending)
Rush Hour 3
Evan Almighty
Shrek the Third (I see why Andrew Adamson jumped ship)
Grudge 2
Ring 2
Boogeyman 2
X-Men 3 (as much as I liked it, Jean, Rogue, Cyclops and Angel's existance throughout the 3 films were pointless)

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Amanda on March 29, 2008 at 12:18pm

Anything that followed Scary Movie 1. The first was okay we get a few cheap laughs but after that it got bad real fast. I will say though that I kind of enjoyed Scary Movie 3 better then Scary Movie 1. Still just Epic Movie, Date Movie, and all them sucked ..... BAD!!!.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Amanda on March 29, 2008 at 1:11pm

Jaws 2 was good same with Batman and Robin, MK Annihilation, and MIB2. Scream 3 was needed in the sense that the 1st covered horror movies, the 2nd covered their sequals, and 3rd covered trilogies. Speaking of trilogies Back to the Future part 3 might not have needed to be made but neither did the second. The trilogy is fun to watch though. The second sucked the most though. As for the rest I completely agree.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by MiCaH on March 29, 2008 at 3:39pm

T.G.R.I., she was talking about sequels that should never have been made. Not every sequel made within the last 30 years.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by StoutGuy29 on March 30, 2008 at 2:33pm

Wow, a list that long that doesn't include Wayne's World 2? That movie... Ugh, I hate that movie (what makes it worse is that I love the first one)

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by thepropayne on April 1, 2008 at 12:00am

Cocoon: The Return?!!!! what are you talking about?! how else would we know if they have a good dental plan on the magical world they are on. lol an if it werent for the sequel i wouldnt know that the people they left behind are all somehow suicidal. what a crappy movie

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by EdMuzick on April 8, 2008 at 10:05pm

Whoa TG! Simmer down, man! Are you saying you've sat through all of those? Are you OK? Can I get you a glass of water or something?

Although, as I look through your list more carefully... I've seen most of those. Maybe I need to go lie down.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Filler on April 8, 2008 at 10:25pm

Silly T.G.R.I., there are no Highlander sequels.

None, at all.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Official Rob on March 30, 2008 at 3:13pm

The only one that comes to mind is Home Alone 3. There was NO reason that should have been a movie. None of the same characters, the villians were anywhere near as cool, and it was just bad.

Damn, I remember watching that in theaters as a kid and hating it.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Frank on March 31, 2008 at 12:22am

Jurassic Park 3

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by DaGirlGenius on March 31, 2008 at 11:47pm

Troll 2

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Rawshark on April 1, 2008 at 12:33am

Do you guys think that a bad movie sequel can effect your view of the original good movie? And if so, how big of an effect? Can it completely ruin it or can you simply pretend that those sequels never happened?

▶ Reply to This

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last