3-d...really???? please stop

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Sav-vy-bag on September 9, 2009 at 10:56pm

I guess it's more profitable...

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by AcE! on September 9, 2009 at 10:57pm

No one's forcing you to watch it in 3D.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by jorge motntoya on September 9, 2009 at 11:00pm

no but seriously..at this rate evry movie will be in 3d and they will stop making them the old fashion way....

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Kent on September 10, 2009 at 12:50am

At what rate? How many movies are made a year and how many of them are in 3D? The MPAA says around 500 to 600 and those don't included unrated and indie films.

And maybe a dozen are in 3D. You're paying way too much attention to this "trend". If i try to think really hard I think there were 3 3D movies this year. Maybe 4. I've seen WAY over 50. So I don't think it's a big deal.

I'm going to Fantastic Fest at the end of the month and there's a presentation on the future of 3D movies and I'll be seeing upwards of 30 movies in that week. I don't think any of them are in 3D...

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Andres Galindo on September 10, 2009 at 1:42am

This Is All Going To Change, Avatar, It'll Change Your View *Even Though In The Trailer It Seems A Little Sucky*

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Kent on September 10, 2009 at 1:43am

Avatar does NOT look sucky. People aren't watching it in HD or 4K. That movie is GORGEOUS.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Khurtzfield on September 14, 2009 at 7:22am

Underwhelming would be a better term, it didn't blow anyones socks off, but what does today. If this movie didn't take 14 years to finally be realized then it would prob have more "WOW" factor. What the trailer needed was more blue female alien ass.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Kent on September 14, 2009 at 2:13pm

I'm sorry but from everyone i know that went to Avatar day or saw it in 3D they say it's fantastic. The trailer doesn't do the film justice.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Cheshire Cat on September 10, 2009 at 2:39am

You know, you can still watch the movie in 2-D.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Khurtzfield on September 14, 2009 at 7:17am

Imagine its the mid 90's, this would be like asking Nintendo to stop putting 64 the end of most 64 games. I understand though, WHOA 3D this movie is worth it right off the bat, no but given enough time the term 3D for movies will become quaint, like calling FPS games Doom Clones.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Miguel on September 14, 2009 at 7:29am

The film industry is pretty much looking for any way to get money, so..

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by AdventChild on September 14, 2009 at 12:43pm

Eh, 3D is just a gimmick that enhances the theater or viewing experience, and a way for movie businesses to make a quick buck. At least, it is optional.

▶ Reply to This

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last